Exploring Students' Level of Conceptual Understanding on Periodicity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v33i1.609Keywords:
Chemical education, conceptual understanding, descriptive, remedial activities, PhilippinesAbstract
Nowadays, many science studies motivated on addressing the conceptual understanding particularly in chemistry that soon may affect students' academic performance. This study covered the level of conceptual understanding on the trends of the periodic table of elements and the type of conceptual change before and after the exposure of interventions. The qualitative and quantitative research method were used in the study. Respondents were Grade 10 high school students. Frequency, percentage, and t-test were the statistical tools applied to answer specific questions. Results revealed that most students have an ambiguous conceptual understanding. The trends in ionization energy (I.E.) noted the highest misconception statements followed by the trends in atomic radius (A.R.). The trends in electron affinity (E.A.); formation of cation and anion (I.R.); and electronegativity (E.) were also least understood by the students. After interventions, there is a marked increase in students who progressed from misconception (MU) to full understanding (FU). This is prevalent on the trends in atomic radius, followed by the trends in electron affinity and the formation of ions. The use of varied activities such as visualizing and multimedia tools; small-group discussions; and concept mapping have a vital positive outcome in their progression. Ergo, science teachers should vary their teaching strategies to address and correct students' conceptual obstacles in learning chemistry concepts.
Metrics
Downloads
References
Blosser, P. E. (1987). Science Misconceptions Research and Some Implications for the Teaching of Science to Elementary School Students. ERIC/SMEAC Science Education Digest No. 1, 1987. Retrieved from http/www.ericdigests. org/pre-925/science.htm. (2007).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Dexter C. Necor

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Open Access. This article published by JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Under the following terms, you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.