Feed backing: A Classroom Interaction Tool in Bachelor of Elementary Education (BEEd) Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v21i1.328Keywords:
Education, rejoinders, classroom intervention, descriptive design, Abra, PhilippinesAbstract
During instruction, a communication starts when the teacher imparts knowledge to the students. When the students absorb the information, process it and give feedback, they undergo a communication process. The study aimed to determine the extent of usage of teacher's feedback in the classroom interactions among Bachelor of Elementary Education (BEEd) students to maximize learning. Frequency counts, frequency percentage, mean and simple correlation analysis were utilized as statistical tools. As a whole, verbal criticisms were often used in Fourth Year while it is sometimes used in the other three-year levels. In general, written feedback was often witnessed in Fourth Year while written response was sometimes observed in the other college levels. Teachers apply more verbal reactions in classroom interactions followed by written and non-verbal feedbacks. Age is significantly related to written opinions. Teachers who have more teaching experiences give more written feedbacks than teachers with less teaching experience. Hence, the type of feedback which was always used in classroom interaction as perceived by the students was written replies while the most often used feedback given by the teacher was verbal feedbacks. There is a significant relationship between the teacher's profile on age, gender, civil status, educational attainment, subject taught and the length of service and the extent of the use of feedback in classroom interactions.
Downloads
References
Abdrafikova, A. R., & Konopatskaya, E. A. (2014). The Case Study Technologies as the Means of Competency Building Approach Realization in Higher Education of Russia. English Language Teaching, 7(12), p94.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Roberto Q. Roldan Jr.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Open Access. This article published by JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Under the following terms, you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.