A Benchmark on the Alternative Education System for Engineering Courses

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7719/irj.v8i1.425

Keywords:

Engineering Education, ETEEAP, tertiary, alternative, descriptive design, Philippines

Abstract

Offered by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) under the Republic of the Philippines, the Expanded Tertiary Education Equivalency and Accreditation (ETEEAP) is an alternative method of earning a college degree. There are 96 Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) that offer ETEEAP in the country, 21 of which offer engineering programs. The study aimed to obtain the best practices being implemented by deputized HEIs offering college degree programs under ETEEAP, particularly, in the field of engineering and check its correlation to the number of graduates. Visitations, observations, and interviews were performed in two selected universities. Information about the enrolled and graduated students were collected. Data gathered were analyzed and tabulated. As an analysis, the policies of the two universities are in accordance of the CHED and, therefore, are similar. A significant increase in the number of engineering graduates under ETEEAP has been recorded. However, some students were not able to finish a program on time. The results of the study can be used as a guiding tool for schools aiming to offer ETEEAP or a reference for continuous improvement of the ETEEAP programs in sustaining the educational needs of the student-clienteles.

References

Barr, R. (2013). Measuring Success: Alternative Education Schools’ Accountability Models.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-26

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2016): October

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Raiza Dimapilis Borreo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Open Access. This article, published by JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). You are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Under the following terms, you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

How to Cite

A Benchmark on the Alternative Education System for Engineering Courses. (2016). JPAIR Institutional Research, 8(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.7719/irj.v8i1.425